Difference between revisions of "Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(238 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=September 27 2016=
 
  
==Agenda==
 
  
1) Type of submissions
+
[[File:July2017.png|400px|thumb|center]]
 
 
* For gene expression micropublications, the submission includes:
 
- reagents used to perform the experiment (transgene, construct, antibody, etc..)
 
 
 
- the read out of the experiment, i.e. image with pattern description and curated metadata
 
 
 
* for phenotype micropublications, Nemametrix has 2 kind of tech notes:
 
 
 
- http://nemametrix.com/trehalose-extends-healthspan-c-elegans/
 
 
 
- http://nemametrix.com/microfluidic-epg-recordings-diverse-nematode-species/
 
 
 
the first one falls into the micropublication scope, the second is more like a Worm Breeder's Gazette article. Discuss.
 
 
 
 
 
2) Workflow
 
 
 
* from Submission through the form till acceptance by a reviewer we need to track the submission and store metadata in a proper way. Are we going to:
 
 
 
- outsource to e-journal press or similar?
 
 
 
- develop in house? Need developer time, Who is going to do it
 
 
 
[[File:Workflow.png|thumb|left]]
 
 
 
[[File:Tasks.png|thumb|center]]
 
 
 
[[File:Time.png|thumb|left]]
 
 
 
 
 
<br clear="all" />
 
 
 
3) Editorial Board
 
 
 
*if we start a journal we need an EIC (Paul?) and an editorial board.Who will select and contact the potential editorial board, when.
 
 
 
 
 
4) Need alternative title than 'Micropublication: biology' as colons can give problems for downstream XREF (from G3 experience)
 
 
 
 
 
==Minutes==
 
 
 
1) Micro vs milli
 
 
 
* Tim suggests to have narrative-containing Micropubs more similar to a short journal article
 
* Those could be millipublications as opposed to just data-driven micropublications
 
* Karen and Daniela will work on different types of Tech notes from Nemametrix and on Worm Breeder's Gazette articles to model that
 
* multiple micropubs can be put together to have the narrative-containing (hypothesis driven) millipub
 
* micropubs in the future could be a plug in we give to journal to collect metadata.
 
 
 
2) Workflow. Outsourcing vs in-house
 
 
 
* Todd: outsourcing gives us more expertise but we loose control
 
* Would be good to have more than one developer involved. Not much resources at the moment
 
* We will touch base with the Collaborative Knowledge Foundation (CoKo, http://coko.foundation) and see what a collaboration would entail.
 
* We will continue to develop forms in-house to move on with the project
 
* we will generate a database with Juancarlos that will store all data but is separate from Postgres used for WB data
 
 
 
3) Editorial board
 
* PWS can be EIC, need to define scope and build editorial board
 
 
 
4) Title
 
* We can call it 'Micropublication biology'
 
* Daniela will check with XREF if calling it 'Micropublication-biology' with a dash -as per Tim's suggestion- will also be an possibility
 
 
 
5) Random
 
* Tim suggesting to capture crispr reagents -> having them published as micros
 
 
 
6) We will have another call in 2 weeks -October 11 approx- unless we have more news from Nemametrix or there is something compelling to discuss.
 
 
 
=October 12 2016=
 
 
 
==Agenda==
 
 
 
1) Reviewers suggestions and policy (1 vs 2 reviewers) for Nemametrix submissions.
 
 
 
* We want to upload 4 nemametrix micropubs by the October 23rd deadline
 
* Need to send out to reviewers ASAP
 
* To whom and how many?
 
 
 
2) Collaboration with the Coko foundation. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ioqHHxfDnDY6YioyIIrAPFKijrcZIePnZIra1YqQhSw/edit]
 
 
 
* They are happy to support us and are developing tools that perfectly fit with our project
 
* They can write LoS or write grant together with us (Software is under MIT license) -> what do we want to do
 
 
 
3) Format of the micropub journal pages [https://drive.google.com/drive/u/2/folders/0B_LC59YpkJJBYXFnQWh6UG13S2s]
 
 
 
* does the proposed format look ok?
 
* this is the page we will send out for review and that will be converted in PDF if the micro is accepted
 

Latest revision as of 22:11, 25 July 2017


July2017.png