Difference between revisions of "Associating genes with papers"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#[[What to do about large-scale papers]] | #[[What to do about large-scale papers]] | ||
#[[What to do about new gene names not yet in WB]] | #[[What to do about new gene names not yet in WB]] | ||
| − | + | #[[What to do about supplemental data]] | |
Back to [[Paper Pipeline]] | Back to [[Paper Pipeline]] | ||
Revision as of 11:22, 5 January 2010
Several possible strategies to test.
Ideally, we'd like to get associations made as quickly as possible (better for users, helps for curation).
For now, restricting analysis to research articles (primary data).
Results may differ for sectioned vs non-sectioned papers, and will likely differ for Reviews, etc.
- Abstracts
- Gene frequency
- Genes in Results (or equivalent)
- Gene frequency in Results (or equivalent)
- Genes mentioned along with word in Figure or Table category
- Genes for which there is curated data
- Some combination of the above
- What to do about large-scale papers
- What to do about new gene names not yet in WB
- What to do about supplemental data
Back to Paper Pipeline
