Difference between revisions of "Associating genes with papers"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Several possible strategies to test. | Several possible strategies to test. | ||
| − | Ideally, we'd like to get associations made as quickly as possible (helps for curation). | + | Ideally, we'd like to get associations made as quickly as possible (better for users, helps for curation). |
| − | For now, restricting to research articles (primary data). | + | For now, restricting analysis to research articles (primary data). |
Results may differ for sectioned vs non-sectioned papers, and will likely differ for Reviews, etc. | Results may differ for sectioned vs non-sectioned papers, and will likely differ for Reviews, etc. | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 5 January 2010
Several possible strategies to test.
Ideally, we'd like to get associations made as quickly as possible (better for users, helps for curation).
For now, restricting analysis to research articles (primary data).
Results may differ for sectioned vs non-sectioned papers, and will likely differ for Reviews, etc.
- Abstracts
- Gene frequency
- Genes in Results (or equivalent)
- Gene frequency in Results (or equivalent)
- Genes mentioned along with word in Figure or Table category
- Genes for which there is curated data
- Some combination of the above
- What to do about large-scale papers
- What to do about new gene names not yet in WB
Back to Paper Pipeline
