Abstracts
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchCurrently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)
Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:
| Number | WBPaper ID | Genes associated via abstract | Genes associated via curator (done or in theory) | Percentage overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 00032891 | cnc-2, dbl-1 | cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 | 10.5% |
| 2 | 00032488 | none | 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only ~15-20% mentioned in the text) | 0% |
| 3 | 00032489 | ain-1, ain-2, let-7, lin-4 | cog-1, daf-12, hbl-1, let-7, lin-4, lin-14, lin-28, lin-41, ain-2, ain-1 | 40% |
| 4 | 00032508 | none | maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay | 0% |
| 5 | 00032509 | lgg-1, sepa-1 | ||
| 6 | 00032506 | unc-5, unc-6, unc-40, unc-129 | ||
| 7 | 00034710 | 0 | ||
| 8 | 00035402 | lin-42 | ||
| 9 | 00031936 | cnb-1, npr-1, tax-2, tax-4, tax-6 | ||
| 10 | 00030829 (tons of supplemental files) | che-1 | ||
| 11 | 00030846 | 0 | aha-1, cky-1 | 0% |
Back to Associating genes with papers
Back to Paper Pipeline
