Difference between revisions of "Abstracts"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 54: Line 54:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! 8
 
! 8
! 35402
+
! 00035402
 
! lin-42
 
! lin-42
 
!  
 
!  
Line 60: Line 60:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! 9
 
! 9
! 31936
+
! 00031936
 
! cnb-1, npr-1, tax-2, tax-4, tax-6
 
! cnb-1, npr-1, tax-2, tax-4, tax-6
 
!  
 
!  
Line 66: Line 66:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! 10
 
! 10
! 30829 (tons of supplemental files)
+
! 00030829 (tons of supplemental files)
 
! che-1
 
! che-1
 
!  
 
!  

Revision as of 12:09, 5 January 2010

Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)

Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:

Number WBPaper ID Genes associated via abstract Genes associated via curator (done or in theory) Percentage overlap
1 00032891 cnc-2, dbl-1 cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 10.5%
2 00032488 none 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only ~15-20% mentioned in the text) 0%
3 00032489 ain-1, ain-2, let-7, lin-4 cog-1, daf-12, hbl-1, let-7, lin-4, lin-14, lin-28, lin-41, ain-2, ain-1 40%
4 00032508 none maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay 0%
5 00032509 lgg-1, sepa-1
6 00032506 unc-5, unc-6, unc-40, unc-129
7 00034710 0
8 00035402 lin-42
9 00031936 cnb-1, npr-1, tax-2, tax-4, tax-6
10 00030829 (tons of supplemental files) che-1


Back to Associating genes with papers

Back to Paper Pipeline