Difference between revisions of "Abstracts"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
! | ! | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! | + | ! 00034710 |
! 0 | ! 0 | ||
! | ! | ||
Revision as of 11:48, 5 January 2010
Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)
Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:
| WBPaper ID | Genes associated via abstract | Genes associated via curator (done or in theory) | Percentage overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00032891 | cnc-2, dbl-1 | cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 | 10.5% |
| 00032488 | none | 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only ~15-20% mentioned in the text) | 0% |
| 00032489 | ain-1, ain-2, let-7, lin-4 | cog-1, daf-12, hbl-1, let-7, lin-4, lin-14, lin-28, lin-41, ain-2, ain-1 | 40% |
| 00032508 | none | maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay | 0% |
| 00032509 | lgg-1, sepa-1 | ||
| 00032506 | unc-5, unc-6, unc-40, unc-129 | ||
| 00034710 | 0 |
Back to Associating genes with papers
Back to Paper Pipeline
