Difference between revisions of "Abstracts"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
! 40%
 
! 40%
 
|-  
 
|-  
 +
! 00032508
 +
! 0
 +
! maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay
 +
! 0%
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 19:01, 4 January 2010

Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)

Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:

WBPaper ID Genes associated via abstract Genes associated via curator Percentage overlap
00032891 cnc-2, dbl-1 cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 10.5%
00032488 none 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only ~15-20% mentioned in the text) 0%
00032489 ain-1, ain-2, let-7, lin-4 cog-1, daf-12, hbl-1, let-7, lin-4, lin-14, lin-28, lin-41, ain-2, ain-1 40%
00032508 0 maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay 0%


Back to Associating genes with papers

Back to Paper Pipeline