Difference between revisions of "Abstracts"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
! 00032488 | ! 00032488 | ||
! none | ! none | ||
| − | ! | + | ! 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only a fraction mentioned in the text) |
| + | ! 0% | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 4 January 2010
Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)
Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:
| WBPaper ID | Genes associated via abstract | Genes associated via curator | Percentage overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00032891 | cnc-2, dbl-1 | cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 | 10.5% |
| 00032488 | none | 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only a fraction mentioned in the text) | 0% |
Back to Associating genes with papers
Back to Paper Pipeline
