Difference between revisions of "Abstracts"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.) Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Are abstracts enough?  Here's the data:
 
Are abstracts enough?  Here's the data:
 +
 +
{| border="1"
 +
|-
 +
! WBPaper ID
 +
! Genes associated via abstract
 +
! Genes associated via curator
 +
! Percentage overlap
 +
|-
 +
! 00032891
 +
! cnc-2, dbl-1
 +
!  cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11
 +
! 10.5%
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 +
 +
Back to [Paper Pipeline]

Revision as of 18:26, 4 January 2010

Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)

Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:

WBPaper ID Genes associated via abstract Genes associated via curator Percentage overlap
00032891 cnc-2, dbl-1 cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 10.5%


Back to [Paper Pipeline]