Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2015.07.02-Agenda and Minutes"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "= Agenda = = Minutes =") |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
| + | please submit your agenda items here | ||
| + | |||
| + | == WS250 schedule == | ||
| + | * reminder of timings | ||
| + | ** 10th July upload | ||
| + | ** 14th of August on FTP | ||
| + | ** 1st of October on live website | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Feedback from IWM == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Helpdesk == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Should we track "date last reviewed"? ([https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/3997 3887]) | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
| + | == WS250 schedule == | ||
| + | bumped to the end of the month: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * reminder of timings | ||
| + | ** 31st July upload | ||
| + | ** 31st of August on FTP | ||
| + | ** 1st of November on live website | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Phenotype/ontology display == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Alphabetical lists not necessarily most helpful, take advantage of the ontology | ||
| + | * Todd: sometimes more specific terms are most useful, don't necessarily want to group towards most general terms. | ||
| + | * Some widgets overloaded with information. Make overview more helpful. | ||
| + | * Should be easy to see if, e.g., a gene has a null allele. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Community contributions, "wiki-style editing" == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Focus on constrained forms instead. | ||
| + | * Keep a clear distinction between data submissions and comments. | ||
| + | * There is already a comment system. Could be promoted better. | ||
| + | * Is there a notification system when someone leaves a comment? | ||
| + | * MA is writing a Gazette article about community curation. Will mention the comment system. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Date last reviewed == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * There is interest in capturing this data. | ||
| + | ** High priority targets are gene structures and concise descriptions. | ||
| + | * Also questions at the meeting about how to see when a gene structure last changed. New isoforms, etc., are NOT currently captured in the history widget. | ||
| + | * OMIM has a "last reviewed on" field at the bottom of each page. | ||
| + | * Should we be curating complete gene pages? | ||
Latest revision as of 08:42, 3 July 2015
Contents
Agenda
please submit your agenda items here
WS250 schedule
- reminder of timings
- 10th July upload
- 14th of August on FTP
- 1st of October on live website
Feedback from IWM
Helpdesk
- Should we track "date last reviewed"? (3887)
Minutes
WS250 schedule
bumped to the end of the month:
- reminder of timings
- 31st July upload
- 31st of August on FTP
- 1st of November on live website
Phenotype/ontology display
- Alphabetical lists not necessarily most helpful, take advantage of the ontology
- Todd: sometimes more specific terms are most useful, don't necessarily want to group towards most general terms.
- Some widgets overloaded with information. Make overview more helpful.
- Should be easy to see if, e.g., a gene has a null allele.
Community contributions, "wiki-style editing"
- Focus on constrained forms instead.
- Keep a clear distinction between data submissions and comments.
- There is already a comment system. Could be promoted better.
- Is there a notification system when someone leaves a comment?
- MA is writing a Gazette article about community curation. Will mention the comment system.
Date last reviewed
- There is interest in capturing this data.
- High priority targets are gene structures and concise descriptions.
- Also questions at the meeting about how to see when a gene structure last changed. New isoforms, etc., are NOT currently captured in the history widget.
- OMIM has a "last reviewed on" field at the bottom of each page.
- Should we be curating complete gene pages?
