Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 106: Line 106:
 
* Paul: Bioprotocols and Protocols IO
 
* Paul: Bioprotocols and Protocols IO
 
* Maybe we could interface with those existing resources to link to relevant protocols from WormBase (and WormBook)
 
* Maybe we could interface with those existing resources to link to relevant protocols from WormBase (and WormBook)
 +
 +
==June 27th, 2019==
 +
===IWM 2019===
 +
*Impressions, analysis, feedback from Users etc etc
 +
 +
===Giving disease model annotations a stable identifier===
 +
*Currently disease model annotations get a temporary ID at the time of dump,
 +
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;
 +
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap;
 +
white-space: -pre-wrap;
 +
white-space: -o-pre-wrap;
 +
word-wrap: break-word">
 +
Disease_model_annotation : "00000004"
 +
Disease_term "DOID:0050833"
 +
Disease_of_species "Homo sapiens"
 +
Variation "WBVar00275555"
 +
Disease_relevant_gene "WBGene00011559"
 +
Inferred_gene "WBGene00011559"
 +
Association_type "is_implicated_in"
 +
Evidence_code "IMP"
 +
Genetic_sex "hermaphrodite"
 +
Paper_evidence "WBPaper00035924"
 +
Database "OMIM" "gene" "613891 "
 +
Database "OMIM" "disease" "258900"
 +
Curator_confirmed "WBPerson324"
 +
Date_last_updated "2017-04-24"
 +
</pre>
 +
*Would like to institute stable identifiers across releases, so the plan is to call these objects, 'WBDisease_annotation:<number>', so then the above identifier would become 'WBDisease_annotation:00000004', or 'WBDiseaseannot:00000004' or 'WBDiseaseAnnot:00000004'
 +
*ID convention--is underscore allowed?
 +
*Is 'WBDisease_annotation:00000004' too long for acedb?

Revision as of 21:08, 26 June 2019

Previous Years

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings

2012 Meetings

2013 Meetings

2014 Meetings

2015 Meetings

2016 Meetings

2017 Meetings

2018 Meetings


GoToMeeting link: https://www.gotomeet.me/wormbase1


2019 Meetings

January

February

March

April

May


June 6, 2019

New SObA graphs

  • May put graphs within existing widgets, but don't need to rush to get that ready for IWM

Phenotype association file format

  • May be best to leave the format as is
  • There are problems; paper IDs keep switching columns
  • Would need to revisit the reasoning for why we do it that way
  • When will the Alliance produce a similar/replacement file? Not sure

Phenotype requests

  • Sent out 1140 emails on May 30
  • Since have received 374 annotations from 54 papers (42 requested, 12 additional)
  • 21 papers flagged as not having phenotypes
  • Of 1140 papers emailed about, 35 emails bounced, and have received some flagging or curation on 63 (63/1105 = ~6% response rate), in first week


June 13, 2019

IWM

  • Coordinating transportation of swag boxes to Pauley Pavilion
  • Workshop on Saturday June 22, from 1pm to 2:30pm
  • Saturday morning micropublication breakfast 7:30 - 8:30am
  • Workshop
    • Presenters: it may be best to present as use cases rather than a research project
    • Chris will cover SimpleMine for Wen
    • Chris: won't do live demo; only screenshots, maybe some video
  • Paul's lab will do marathon bibs to show lab affiliation and graphical abstract
  • Paul's talk
    • Cover Alliance
    • New features
      • SObA (for new data)
      • Complete for protein-protein interactions
      • RNASeq tools
      • Updated automated gene concise descriptions?
    • Phenotype community curation
      • Chris will send Paul numbers on: top community curators, overall stats (number of annotations, papers, curators)
    • Author First Pass
    • Micropublication

SGD SAB

  • Paul attended
  • Alliance publicity was discussed
  • SAB likes the Alliance orthology features
  • Working on topics: displaying papers and data
  • Pathways: discussion about best approach
  • Metabolic engineering
  • Meta data about RNASeq data
    • SPELL tool, basically only tool of its kind available; need new tools
  • Species-specific proteins: how best to find them? HMMs (Jackhammer)?

Concise descriptions

  • Progress being made within the Alliance to update the automated concise gene descriptions
  • We will still accept manually written descriptions and display them in parallel with automated descriptions

Micropublications

  • If people are requesting manually written gene descriptions, they could submit a microreview
  • Concern was expressed about how to handle a really high throughput of submissions:
    • Daniela: Working towards automating as much of the processing pipeline as possible
    • Raymond: The throughput will be handled appropriately depending on demand; priority scheme will help
    • Not getting lots of submissions yet, probably won't be inundated in the near future
    • Karen: tools are still being developed; the platform is not being advertised as much as it could be; will ramp up outreach and communication once tools are in place to handle more submissions
  • Karen: Micropublications team will reach out to curators to help build submission forms for respective data types

Undiagnosed Disease Network data

  • Andy Golden will meet with Ranjana and Chris at IWM to discuss
  • Andy asked about protocol pages at WormBase?
  • Paul: Bioprotocols and Protocols IO
  • Maybe we could interface with those existing resources to link to relevant protocols from WormBase (and WormBook)

June 27th, 2019

IWM 2019

  • Impressions, analysis, feedback from Users etc etc

Giving disease model annotations a stable identifier

  • Currently disease model annotations get a temporary ID at the time of dump,
Disease_model_annotation : "00000004"
Disease_term	"DOID:0050833"
Disease_of_species	"Homo sapiens"
Variation	"WBVar00275555"
Disease_relevant_gene	"WBGene00011559"
Inferred_gene	"WBGene00011559"
Association_type	"is_implicated_in"
Evidence_code	"IMP"
Genetic_sex	"hermaphrodite"
Paper_evidence	"WBPaper00035924"
Database "OMIM" "gene"	"613891 "
Database "OMIM" "disease"	"258900"
Curator_confirmed	"WBPerson324"
Date_last_updated	"2017-04-24"
  • Would like to institute stable identifiers across releases, so the plan is to call these objects, 'WBDisease_annotation:<number>', so then the above identifier would become 'WBDisease_annotation:00000004', or 'WBDiseaseannot:00000004' or 'WBDiseaseAnnot:00000004'
  • ID convention--is underscore allowed?
  • Is 'WBDisease_annotation:00000004' too long for acedb?